in vs hasOwnProperty(): Differences in Inherited Properties
The article explains the differences between JavaScript's 'in' operator and 'hasOwnProperty()' method. And also learn the use cases of both in JS.
When working with objects in JavaScript, you'll often need to check if an object contains a specific property. There are two main ways to test for the existence of a property:
- The in operator
- The hasOwnProperty() method
At first glance, these two seem interchangeable. But there are important differences in how inherited properties are handled.
How in Operator Works
The in operator checks if the specified property exists in the object, or anywhere in its prototype chain.
For example:
const person = { name: 'John' }; 'name' in person; // true 'toString' in person; // true
The 'name' property exists directly on the person object. But 'toString' is inherited from person's prototype chain.
in returns true for both existing and inherited properties.
How hasOwnProperty() method Works
The hasOwnProperty() method checks if the property exists on the object instance itself, not including properties from the prototype chain.
Learn more about it here : JavaScript hasOwnProperty() method of an Object
For example:
const person = { name: 'John' }; person.hasOwnProperty('name'); // true person.hasOwnProperty('toString'); // false
'string'(name) exists only on person, so hasOwnProperty() returns true. But 'toString' is inherited, so it returns false.
The Difference With Inherited Properties
The main difference between using in and hasOwnProperty() when dealing with inheritance in JavaScript is:
- The
inoperator will return true for properties that are inherited from an object's prototype chain. - The
hasOwnProperty()method will only return true for properties that are defined directly on the object instance itself, not inherited properties.
In JavaScript, objects can inherit properties and methods from their prototype chain. Properties like toString and constructor exist on the Object prototype and are inherited by all objects:
const obj = {}; 'constructor' in obj; // true obj.hasOwnProperty('constructor'); // false
The in operator returns true for these inherited properties. But they don't actually exist directly on the obj object.
With in, this can accidentally overwrite the constructor property. hasOwnProperty() avoids this issue by not checking the prototype chain.
The Dangers of in with Inherited Properties
To demonstrate the issue, all objects inherit a constructor property from Object.prototype:
const obj = {}; 'constructor' in obj; // true
This seems to imply that obj has its own constructor. But hasOwnProperty() reveals the truth:
obj.hasOwnProperty('constructor'); // false
The constructor was inherited, not defined on obj itself.
Accidentally overriding inherited properties like this can cause bugs:
function Person(name) { this.name = name; } const me = new Person('John'); // Override inherited constructor 'constructor' in me; // true - uh oh me.constructor = function() {}; // me's constructor is now broken
Avoiding Issues with hasOwnProperty()
The hasOwnProperty() method avoids such bugs by distinguishing own vs inherited properties:
const me = new Person('John'); me.hasOwnProperty('constructor'); // false - good if (!me.hasOwnProperty('constructor')) { me.constructor = function() {}; }
When to Use in vs hasOwnProperty()
- Use in to check if a property exists before accessing it. But be careful with inherited properties.
- Use hasOwnProperty() to check if a property belongs to the object instance itself. This is better in most cases.
- Use in to check if an object has a method you want to call. Like checking for 'toString' before calling it.
Difference between in operator and hasOwnProperty()
Here is a table summarizing the key differences between the in operator and hasOwnProperty() method in JavaScript:
| in | hasOwnProperty() | |
|---|---|---|
| Checks prototype chain | Yes | No |
| Returns true for inherited properties | Yes | No |
| Returns true for own properties | Yes | Yes |
| Handles inherited methods | Yes | No |
| Safer for checking property existence | No | Yes |
| Can cause issues with inherited properties like constructor | Yes | No |
| Use case - check before calling a method | Good | Avoid |
| Use case - check if property exists on object | Avoid | Good |
Conclusion
The in operator checks for properties in the entire prototype chain. hasOwnProperty() only checks the object instance itself.
In most cases, hasOwnProperty() is the safer choice to avoid issues with inherited properties. But in is useful when you need to check for a method before calling it.
Understanding these differences will help you write better JavaScript code and avoid bugs!
Related Posts
Press Shift + Enter for new Line in Textarea
Override default textarea behavior on Enter key press without Shift, prevent new lines, and take custom actions like submitting forms instead. Still allow Shift+Enter newlines.
How to Fix "ReferenceError: document is not defined" in JavaScript
The "ReferenceError: document is not defined" is a common error in JavaScript that occurs when trying to access the `document` object in a non-browser environment like Node.js.
How to Fix the "Cannot Read Property of Undefined" Error in JavaScript
The "Cannot read property of undefined" error occurs when you try to access a property or method of a variable that is undefined in JavaScript.
Remove special characters of the URL in JavaScript
Learn how to remove special characters from URLs using JavaScript. Avoid broken links and improve website accessibility with our solutions.
